I will redo the whole thing, but give me time. I have a lot of works to do. Thanks for advising

Ratio is so wrong? Anyway there is maybe no real reason why this was not processed yet. There is no rule for processing, some seem to take newest contributions first, others try to take oldest first.
But indeed here the fact that pictures are cropped is annoying, and if ratio is wrong it is hard to fix with cropped pictures.

OK, I will redo.

and they have been cropped

I'm guessing the reason this is still being ignored is cos the ratio is completely wrong, i dont know what to do with these

I know...
Well, let me be more specific:
The first two and the fourth one listed should be grouped together since they're Long wheel base models. The one in the third thumbnail is an older 1998 model and should probably be grouped separately, as should be the older one.

And due to the fact that this one is older than the other two;
http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=0311200813h52m21s010fp7.jpg

I don't think it should be grouped with the other Crown Vics.

Well that's what I meant when I said most. And I was referring to the sedans, I guess I should have been more specific.

Well, one was a little older. Then again, there was also one that was a Toyota Sienna(the one that subzero thought was a Dodge Caravan).

Unknown silver boring thing: '0-'1 Nissan Maxima