IMCDb Forum
Send an answer to a topic: [Done] bedtime stories 2008
Warning, this subject is old (5752 days without answer)
Subject
Bold [b]Text[/b] Italic [i]Italic[/i] Underline [u]Underline[/u] Strike Out [strike]Strike Out[/strike]
Email [email=nobody@nobody.org]Name[/email] Link [url=http://www.website.com]Text[/url] Anchor [anchor]Name[/anchor] Image [img]http://www.website.com/image.jpg[/img]
Align Left [align=left]Text[/align] Centered [align=center]Text[/align] Align Right [align=right]Text[/align] Text Justify [align=justify]Text[/text]
Color [color=#000000]Text[/color] Highlight [highlight=pascal]Text[/highlight] Widgets Smileys :code: [:code] HTML to BBCode converter Word to BBCode converter
Preview Spell Checker

Copy Paste Cut Select All
Clear Insert Date Insert Time Insert Date and Time Insert your IP
List [list=square][item]BlaBla[/item][/list] Numbered List [list=decimal][item]BlaBla[/item][/list]
Quote [quote=name]Text[/quote] Spoiler [spoiler]James is the murderer![/spoiler]
Uppercase [uppercase]Text[/uppercase] Lowercase [lowercase]Text[/lowercase] l33t [l33t]I'm a Nerd[/l33t] Sub Script [sub]Text[/sub] Super Script [sup]Text[/sup] Size of Text [size=8]Text[/size]

Options
 
 
 
 
vilero
I'm very sorry but you must understand that I must answer (same contiditions) that I wrote here http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4439-Done_over_250_new_pics_for___the_french_connection___1971.html

I'll tyr to explain in a polite way (if my poor english let me) than with pics like yours 253, we'll ruin the page
http://imcdb.org/movie_67116-The-French-Connection.html

Have a look there and you'll see that there are now 4 contributors in this page. All pics are submited with DVD (or nearly) quality.
Imagine that you find a movie not listed or partially listed. Well in that case there isn't problem (or less problem) with your pics. Bad or good pics we'll submited them and, later, when you or other user get the movie in a better quality we'll changed the old pics for the better new ones but you will be as provider of this movie since you posted them before.
But if we let these pics, we must say YES to everything that other user wants to be submited.
Do you understand this position?
With pages previuosly listed, the site must improve its quality, and doesn't get worse.

It's hard and difficult to me say you (with your previuos big effort) that your pics don't satisfy the contidions of backgrounds cars http://imcdb.org/help.php#HelpGuidelines

I encourage you to go on, but not this way, please.
Get a program that let you make screen captures (I told you by private), tested before you post here, also have a look to this tutorial http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-1201-How_you_can_submit_pictures.html (you can also in free download get XnView) and you will see (then) how many time you lost before and the easy way to post goods cars here.
Don't become disheartened by my words. The better way to know everything is to make a mistake and stand up again.
Thanks


Note: the gumball rally (1976) group project http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4493-the_gumball_rally_1976_group_project.html
And thunder road (1958) http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4495-thunder_road_1958.html are well.
Except some cars already listed, others seen through the window of other car and some with partial view, will be submited in the site
antp
if its a new or newer movie you can't even tell i use a camera like for instance the gone in 60 seconds (1974) i did was with a camera and you didn't notice but it was that it was a high quality movie!!!


I noticed that colors/sharpness was strange, I thought this was due to a VHS copy or something like that...
On these pics it was indeed less visible that it was it was taken with a camera.
But on some of the latest ones submitted, it is very visible.
typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)


actually i have 2 more movies that i did on camera that i think i will use any ways because there pretty good quality and i bet more than 95% are acceptable!!!

yeah i just checked and compared to the last ones i did almost if not all are more than acceptable by your standards as images!!!
typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)


great that i have a faster and waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better way to do this but i am gonna have about 560 images to redo!!!!!!! yeah thats gonna take me awhile!!!
typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)



ok um i followed that one guy directions and downloaded wmcp and tried it and it worked!!! wont play audio right for some reason but it captures good!!! son i will watch on wmp the i will get the images on wmcp!!! so what i will do in the future is rerent bullitt, french connection, american graffiti, and 2 other movie i did all ready!!!
typhlosion
Yes, but no matter how good your camera is, the quality will always only be supbar compared to captures you get from using a computer program to take them. It's really not that hard. I learned recently thanks to antp and other members on here. Check the tutorial :wink:

But I really don't think having these images would be beneficial, in my honest opinion.


yes and i am gonna try tonight!!!!
ford_guy
Yes, but no matter how good your camera is, the quality will always only be supbar compared to captures you get from using a computer program to take them. It's really not that hard. I learned recently thanks to antp and other members on here. Check the tutorial :wink:

But I really don't think having these images would be beneficial, in my honest opinion.
typhlosion


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)


that has nothing to do with this particular movie! if its a new or newer movie you can't even tell i use a camera like for instance the gone in 60 seconds (1974) i did was with a camera and you didn't notice but it was that it was a high quality movie!!!
i took these with my camera but i got these from a illegal movie download site before the movie even came out in theaters and it was in the quality you see before you!!!
vilero
..............................
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)

I have just mailed typhlosion with the easy way to get captures. Better wait a few days for his answer.
But if he doesn't, I think it's a pity to keep in "contributions" this post and the other you said
antp

Post Data: also could you get a copy of this movie?. It's a new one (2008) and the images are very blurred.
Here http://www.traileraddict.com/tags/bedtime-stories you have 27 trailers and most of them in HD.


HD trailer would not change anything: he makes pictures with a digital camera from TV, so that gives awful quality...
cf my comments on http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-4477-28859-american_graffiti_1973_group_project.html#p28859
(and I still do not get the point of doing that)
Category:  






Ada
CSS
Cobol
CPP
HTML
Fortran
Java
JavaScript
Pascal
Perl
PHP
Python
SQL
VB
XML
Anon URL
DailyMotion
eBay
Flickr
FLV
Google Video
Metacafe
MP3
SeeqPod
Veoh
Yahoo Video
YouTube
6px
8px
10px
12px
14px
16px
18px
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2024 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare