Delete a Message
Well, first of all thanks a lot Antoine for remembering this and always having it into account 
Second, i think that this of little damage, a lot of damage, etc is not useful at all, namely because a lot of users will find it boring, all i wanted when this idea was created was to just exactly know wether a car is actually involved in a car chase (which we now cant know since three stars is for both car chases and use frecuently by a character) or in a car crash.
In case there are replicas involved or shells with a comment said it would be enough, if we have the case that a completely different car has been used for the crash scene, then, that different car will have the rate of Destroyed or used in a car crash, as it was only used in that little scene, we have some of these cases already.
And perhaps it would be good to have another option to say if the car was destroyed in a crash by using CGI, also (this might sound complicated but it wont be) we will have to see the difference between wether the car was involved in a crash only or in a whole car chase, but theres a draw back in this, that sometimes we may not know the car is also involved in a crash appart from a car chase so.
To simplify things, if we have a car like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1896-BMW-535i-E34-1991.html or like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_109730-Chevrolet-Chevelle-SS-1969.html we probably should say, INVOLVED IN A CRASH and USED IN A CAR CHASE and in cases like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_106861-Spyker-C8-Spyder-2006.html or like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_3103-Peugeot-406-1996.html we will only have to say INVOLVED IN A CAR CHASE.
Antoine understand that?? if you want me to rewrite something just tell me, or if theres something you dont understand.
Second, i think that this of little damage, a lot of damage, etc is not useful at all, namely because a lot of users will find it boring, all i wanted when this idea was created was to just exactly know wether a car is actually involved in a car chase (which we now cant know since three stars is for both car chases and use frecuently by a character) or in a car crash.
In case there are replicas involved or shells with a comment said it would be enough, if we have the case that a completely different car has been used for the crash scene, then, that different car will have the rate of Destroyed or used in a car crash, as it was only used in that little scene, we have some of these cases already.
And perhaps it would be good to have another option to say if the car was destroyed in a crash by using CGI, also (this might sound complicated but it wont be) we will have to see the difference between wether the car was involved in a crash only or in a whole car chase, but theres a draw back in this, that sometimes we may not know the car is also involved in a crash appart from a car chase so.
To simplify things, if we have a car like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1896-BMW-535i-E34-1991.html or like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_109730-Chevrolet-Chevelle-SS-1969.html we probably should say, INVOLVED IN A CRASH and USED IN A CAR CHASE and in cases like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_106861-Spyker-C8-Spyder-2006.html or like http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_3103-Peugeot-406-1996.html we will only have to say INVOLVED IN A CAR CHASE.
Antoine understand that?? if you want me to rewrite something just tell me, or if theres something you dont understand.