I agree with you in what you said right inmediately after me, but this last paragraph is once again one of your reasons why you hate SUVs and not why is unfair for pre 1992 cars to be banned to the city centre of a certain city, please, and really i dont want you to feel offended by me but i think wether you think they should be used for one thing or another is not the main subject now really.

Anyway, luxury SUVs are always owned by people with money so the fact that taxes will rise up wont make them decrease i dont think, for the smallest on the maket like Vitaras etc it may decrease, what is really unfair as i pointed out upper is the fact that old cars are banned, just totally unfair, how many people are out there that cant afford owning a brand new nor even a second hand vehicles and they have to buy something really old ans used, being more than ten years old? i think a lot, there are also many teenagers or just young people in their twenties owning these old cars because they cant get a better thing or they just dont need anything better, so why should they feel forced to buy a new car if they dont need one? this turns into a thing of the goverment like they have been doing in Spain for ten years (with a thing called Plan Prever in where when you were going to buy a car you'd recieved money if you gave the old one), if they want less old cars on the road so they dont pollute i think they should help people or something, they'll realise it's a good thing and then theyll probably be able to afford a less-polluting vehicle, but you have to give people facilities and not just deciding something like these, which sounds stupid, and lets not mention what GMANN says about "important" or "well known" "classic" cars, you can remove from the roads the old "diary-use" vehicles but the jewels...