Delete a Message
When picture/s submited are blurred, dark, from trailers, etc (but these pics are the first filling the blanks)... and later are changed for DVD quality....that is well done. Perfect.
But why the providers of these (first) pictures must lose their quality of providers of the film?. Doing that, I think, their work (the first work about any movie or car of it) is later (when pics are changed for better ones) looked down and not rewarded.
I have seen that occasionally with movies provided for others users and, now, with a picture provided by me. I think this way is not very polite.
When I found blanks in "The Big Steal" movie http://www.imcdb.org/movie_99138-The-Big-Steal.html the only pictures submited about this movie were the Jaguar XJ6 [Series I] http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_32155-Jaguar-XJ6-Series-I-1969.html and the Jaguar XJ6 [Series II] http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_32156-Jaguar-XJ6-Series-II-1974.html and, in those days with blank, only the 1964 Nissan Cedric [G31] ( http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_91483-Nissan-Cedric-G31-1964.html ). Wickey, probably I remember, submited some pics too.
I found a good trailer of this movie and I posted in "Contributions" a pic of it. This Nissan Cedric.
"Australian Screen" can be read down at right.
Later Valiant1962 found the DVD about this movie and changed my picture for a better one and others from the Jaguar. It's well done. Perfect.
But, and that's the reason of this post, why must I lose the provider quality of the movie? Why others users can loose this quality in equal occasions?
In this case my work hasn't been rewarded and, doing that, users can be discouraged in futures efforts.
Even more, think that, in future, a better DVD in HD and in a new remastered (this last word I don't know is well used or not) version of this movie appears and the pisc of the movie are changed again for betters ones for other user. Why must Valiant1962 lose his quality of provider of this movie?
This situation, I repeat, it's not new. I think the provider of a picture in main page, initially in blank and/or later changed for a better one, must stay always as a provider of that movie. And if later the movie's pictures are submited in DVD quality, this user must stay as provider and in comments of that car that have been changed must be showed his pictures and saying as usual "XXXXX(user) wrote (and showing his changed picture)". I think this way is polite with all users and all can see our works are rewared.
Thanks guys.
But why the providers of these (first) pictures must lose their quality of providers of the film?. Doing that, I think, their work (the first work about any movie or car of it) is later (when pics are changed for better ones) looked down and not rewarded.
I have seen that occasionally with movies provided for others users and, now, with a picture provided by me. I think this way is not very polite.
When I found blanks in "The Big Steal" movie http://www.imcdb.org/movie_99138-The-Big-Steal.html the only pictures submited about this movie were the Jaguar XJ6 [Series I] http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_32155-Jaguar-XJ6-Series-I-1969.html and the Jaguar XJ6 [Series II] http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_32156-Jaguar-XJ6-Series-II-1974.html and, in those days with blank, only the 1964 Nissan Cedric [G31] ( http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_91483-Nissan-Cedric-G31-1964.html ). Wickey, probably I remember, submited some pics too.
I found a good trailer of this movie and I posted in "Contributions" a pic of it. This Nissan Cedric.
"Australian Screen" can be read down at right.
Later Valiant1962 found the DVD about this movie and changed my picture for a better one and others from the Jaguar. It's well done. Perfect.
But, and that's the reason of this post, why must I lose the provider quality of the movie? Why others users can loose this quality in equal occasions?
In this case my work hasn't been rewarded and, doing that, users can be discouraged in futures efforts.
Even more, think that, in future, a better DVD in HD and in a new remastered (this last word I don't know is well used or not) version of this movie appears and the pisc of the movie are changed again for betters ones for other user. Why must Valiant1962 lose his quality of provider of this movie?
This situation, I repeat, it's not new. I think the provider of a picture in main page, initially in blank and/or later changed for a better one, must stay always as a provider of that movie. And if later the movie's pictures are submited in DVD quality, this user must stay as provider and in comments of that car that have been changed must be showed his pictures and saying as usual "XXXXX(user) wrote (and showing his changed picture)". I think this way is polite with all users and all can see our works are rewared.
Thanks guys.