Delete a Message
night cub
Err, you have noticed my specific quoting above the pic? Have you?
![:tongue: :tongue:](images/smileys/tongue.gif)
I'm not complaining about pics like that, they are totally legal (and according my preferences
![:bogoss: :bogoss:](images/smileys/bogoss.gif)
But this kind of chavy advertises, meant for a chavy underclass target audience, pulls down our reputation in a very bad way. I'm not the only one, who classifies and charcterizes a website (also print-magazines and TV-programmes) by the respectives advertises. When I see such chavy advertises, I put the homepage, where they are on, on the same level - and the members and users there, too!
You my call my habit prejudice, preposession, conceit or so, that's not wrong - but you always have to think about, that a lot of other people do think in the same way. So you, Antoine should be careful, that not too many people with a serious interest in our engagement get scared due this underclass-shit.
You know you can't have it both ways. You complain when Antoine is trying to delete the pics of naked women (which don't belong here and are against board rules), which is the reason that Google Ads dropped the site. You cried "CENSORSHIP". And now you complain when the replacement has lower standards. Which he wouldn't have to do if people followed the few rules here. You can't bitch about both. Pick a side and stop chastising the rest of us who are trying to clean up the site. The nice thing about Google Ads is that the website owner can choose what type of ads appear on their page. Not sure if the replacement ad placers do the same.