Delete a Message
dsl
I have tried to tidy up bits of the Lotus collection every so often - perhaps completing [codes] for individual models when some were entered and others blank, or making model names consistent etc, but don't have a full grasp across all Lotuses to know whether we've got consistent referencing. I don't think we've got any major black holes or contradictions, but if you can spot any, shout loudly. There may be different [code] systems running with some of the race cars, where some have individual chassis numbers entered (particularly F1 cars), as with the Rolls-Royce reference ^ for the same reasons - we also do the same where possible with eg Ferrari racers, Ford GT40 etc.
Registration numbers would not normally goes as [codes]. Occasionally they go in Extra Info if very significant particular cars but it's far more common for plate info to appear in comments - if a car appears in several different films, we tend to provide page links in comments - random example to show how this works - http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=334456 .
Always welcome - the more knowledge we can accumulate the better. And we love accuracy so much it hurts sometimes.
Registration numbers would not normally goes as [codes]. Occasionally they go in Extra Info if very significant particular cars but it's far more common for plate info to appear in comments - if a car appears in several different films, we tend to provide page links in comments - random example to show how this works - http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=334456 .
Once I have a better idea of what info should be there, I can make specific change suggestions.
Always welcome - the more knowledge we can accumulate the better. And we love accuracy so much it hurts sometimes.