I fully agree that cars listed without images are quite annoying.

The reason I reject the listing of 'no-car-films' in the publicly addressable areas is the appearance of such listings to normal users. It is like searching on IMDb for 'Ian Fleming' or 'Stephen King' and getting a list of books that were *not* used as a film script.

Of course your idea to save other active users from checking a 'no-car-film' for cars is noble and a good one. We could have a list of such films in a separate place.

A problem might be cars that are not very well visible. Some of us wouldn't list such cars and therefore would list such a film as a 'no-car-film'. Others might like to list such a vehicle as it is very rare, no matter how small or blurred it is.

I don't want to be dogmatic about things, but another problem arises with the selection of 'no-car-film' that should be listed. You mentioned as a film not to be listed 'Star Wars'. Actually this is a 'car-film':

Underneath is a real car with wheels, hidden by mirrors.