General » Nude pics vs Google
Reminder of the previous message
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 04:53:21, By MisterZ
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 09:06:24, By ingo
What on Earth does that mean? Anyone wearing clothes?
No, when you have sexual-related thoughts concealed in your mind. What's up then? Shouldn't better IMCDb-members, who a thinking in this way, when the are logged in, better be banned?
Sorry, but I cannot take this bullshit here seriously any more
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 10:08:10, By antp
Thanks for the links, I'll check these.
No, I think it covers cases like lingerie or cases where the few strategic parts are just discretely hidden but the whole thing still looks like a nude scene (so I am not sure if the pics from the Bodyguard movie posted previously would be "legal").
Sorry, but I cannot take this bullshit here seriously any more
It is serious bullshit indeed but as it should not be a problem for the site subject (and would allow the site to be family-safe) I prefer comply to that than having to find another source of revenue.
Many of the pics were out of line anyway, even without these strict guidelines.
Latest Edition: 07/01/2014 @ 10:10:13
No, I think it covers cases like lingerie or cases where the few strategic parts are just discretely hidden but the whole thing still looks like a nude scene (so I am not sure if the pics from the Bodyguard movie posted previously would be "legal").
Sorry, but I cannot take this bullshit here seriously any more
It is serious bullshit indeed but as it should not be a problem for the site subject (and would allow the site to be family-safe) I prefer comply to that than having to find another source of revenue.
Many of the pics were out of line anyway, even without these strict guidelines.
Latest Edition: 07/01/2014 @ 10:10:13
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 12:18:23, By G-MANN
Exactly, we drew up our own guidelines concerning nude pics (see the Help/FAQ page) but these weren't really enforced.
Latest Edition: 07/01/2014 @ 12:19:50
Latest Edition: 07/01/2014 @ 12:19:50
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 14:30:06, By Neon
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_117765-Striptease.html Ralph's comment
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 14:40:30, By Neon
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 16:38:26, By antp
I'll put that one in my "I do not know yet" list
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 18:34:12, By mike962
well my "sexiest" upload is probably this but no nudity present
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_562161-Chevrolet-Blazer-S-10-1998.html
Latest Edition: 07/01/2014 @ 18:34:35
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_562161-Chevrolet-Blazer-S-10-1998.html
Latest Edition: 07/01/2014 @ 18:34:35
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 19:12:05, By ingo
well my "sexiest" upload is probably this but no nudity present
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_562161-Chevrolet-Blazer-S-10-1998.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_562161-Chevrolet-Blazer-S-10-1998.html
Except you measure with Saudi Arabian standards
This now here becoming really paranoid rushing ahead servience becomes a real pain in the ass (am I allowed to use such diction or am I not Google-compatible/acceptable any more with that? ) so I got the idea to offer our community a real relaxing and paranoid-tea-party-ideas-free event: let us meet at a hot summer day at an arbitrary German or Dutch beach or bathing lake. There you can see/enjoy everthing, we are now "cleaning" in a touchy-submissive way.
@mike962: do you have some specific suggestions? If not, no problem for me - there re more than enough possibilities around here.
(P.S. Nudist areas only without me. They absolutely spoil my appetite. For food and any kind of beverages, either alcoholic or non-alcoholic. And for cutie-spotting,too. But those don't exist there anyways)
Nude pics vs Google
Published 07/01/2014 @ 21:02:59, By antp
Please focus on the original subject, finding nude pics that are clearly useless for the site... (i.e. in comments) or those that could be considered as "to be censored".
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 16:57:20, By antp
(working backwards again, did page 13 to page 10)
cleaned page 9 and a few more on page 10
edit: and 8
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 18:15:50
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 18:45:26, By G-MANN
But have you found out exactly what Google wants removed?
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 19:28:10, By antp
No.
And I doubt that there is an exact page to correct.
It is more likely that the decision from Google is definitive and that I'll have to find another ad system.
But as others usually have rules about adult contents, it is not a bad thing to clean that (also to make the site more serious and family-friendly at the same time).
And I doubt that there is an exact page to correct.
It is more likely that the decision from Google is definitive and that I'll have to find another ad system.
But as others usually have rules about adult contents, it is not a bad thing to clean that (also to make the site more serious and family-friendly at the same time).
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 20:00:09, By ingo
I would do - but as Antoine already has mentioned, Google makes him richer than the shitty Cents of us poor devils ever could do...
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 20:02:23, By ingo
also to make the site more serious and family-friendly at the same time).
It cannot be more mendacious.
(Of course I don't mean you, Antoine)
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 21:24:31, By cibup
I think these are the only ones, among my contributions, which may offend the sensibilities of the most prudish.
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_651654-Chrysler-Stratus-2000.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_651652-Rover-400-R8-1992.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_651654-Chrysler-Stratus-2000.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_651652-Rover-400-R8-1992.html
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 21:51:21, By antp
Indeed the thumbnail images with boobs visible are probably not fully compliant...
They could be deleted since they do not show more of the car than the main pics
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 22:08:36
They could be deleted since they do not show more of the car than the main pics
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 22:08:36
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 22:42:23, By G-MANN
No.
And I doubt that there is an exact page to correct.
And I doubt that there is an exact page to correct.
I don't have the first idea about how this stuff would work, but at a guess, I'd say maybe it's the amount of nude pics we have/had?
Legally I can't say in public what I earn via Google Adsence (yes, that's how strict they are), but anyway donations would not reach that each month I think.
Are you saying you profit from this site? Or do the fees for the site use up most of the money earned?
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 22:43:42
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 22:47:45, By antp
I don't have the first idea about how this stuff would work, but at a guess, I'd say maybe it's the amount of nude pics we have/had?
I do not know how they decide to block an account like that.
I suppose there was either a complain, or an automatic detection on several pictures...
Are you saying you profit from this site? Or do the fees for the site use up most of the money earned?
There is a small profit, ads earn more than what the site costs to manage.
But it also takes time to manage
And it is to try to increase the profit that my brother-in-law joined to rewrite the site to improve it.
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 22:48:24
Nude pics vs Google
Published 08/01/2014 @ 22:52:18, By G-MANN
As long as you aren't making thousands of dollars/Euros in profit, I don't begrudge you making a bit of money out of the site
But roughly how much does the site cost? Is it in the hundreds or thousands?
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 22:54:19
But roughly how much does the site cost? Is it in the hundreds or thousands?
Latest Edition: 08/01/2014 @ 22:54:19