15/12/2015 @ 21:24:24: eLMeR: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
These
TopKicks/
Kodiaks were still set as
unknown when
Mike962 wrote his post. Which may explain why he felt so uncomfortable with these pages
But these changes (and some others) were on my to-do list, so that was just a matter of time before the
unknown "identifications" disappear. But as we all know,
Mike962 and patience...
15/12/2015 @ 22:20:43: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
And about the Reo/Jeep/AM General (from the older to the newer), I suggest we take the name based on a year estimation of the vehicle and the movie it appears, probably often by guessing, but to me it is still better than just keeping these as "unknown". It can always be mentioned in the comments that the make is unsure, just for future reference.
16/12/2015 @ 02:05:12: eLMeR: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
[...] It can always be mentioned in the comments that the make is unsure, just for future reference.
It should be noted each time a default make or model is used, I think. It won't avoid unchecked internal reference by some contributors, but it would at least reflect the facts...
Will there be a "as default identification" field/check-box, in the NextGen?
16/12/2015 @ 20:30:39: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Until now usually comments allow to see if it was properly identified or just taken random amongst several names.
About the check box "by default", not yet done, but that would be very easy to add, I'll put it on the to-do list
17/12/2015 @ 02:05:03: eLMeR: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Until now usually comments allow to see if it was properly identified or just taken random amongst several names. [...]
Only if the contributor who proposed the vehicle added a comment about it, or if the admin who validated/modified the identification "left a trace". I'm sure a lot of "default identifications" are not so easily visible
17/12/2015 @ 18:43:00: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
18/12/2015 @ 20:28:00: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
19/12/2015 @ 16:58:32: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
20/12/2015 @ 23:41:39: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
21/12/2015 @ 10:42:15: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
21/12/2015 @ 17:03:42: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
21/12/2015 @ 18:24:09: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Indeed; I thought it was just a dumper on tracks
21/12/2015 @ 19:55:14: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
22/12/2015 @ 16:22:25: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
For the make I believe you, as I guess there aren't many others that could look similar indeed, but that other one you give as proof is another model
SB 140 vs SB 127...
(or do you mean then that it is 140 instead of the 127 originally given?)
22/12/2015 @ 18:57:22: Gamer: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
22/12/2015 @ 20:23:52: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
For the make I believe you, as I guess there aren't many others that could look similar indeed, but that other one you give as proof is another model
SB 140 vs SB 127...
(or do you mean then that it is 140 instead of the 127 originally given?)
I would say Sisu SB-Series
they are also named "monosisu" in the ads
http://www.nettikone.com/sisu/sb-127-monisisu/122527523/12/2015 @ 16:56:31: Gamer: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
