09/09/2016 @ 17:17:15: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Except if Lateef lies (
), I'd say 2-star... (very minor role, but still more than just a background role)
Lateef is confused to say the least
see the video footage yourself 16.48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gUxpg7PFBs
it exactly same role as that 1 star lawn mover ,
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_923850.html
just a chair essentially , even that this time it's even much worse visible than that lawn mover and the great Lateef didn't object to that being just one star...
09/09/2016 @ 17:29:13: Lateef: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I'm not the confused one here.
The driver of the Rekord communicates with the person operating the loader, which would be the same as if the main character pulls up alongside another car and the person in the other car talks to him. That would make it a two-star vehicle, right, so why not this one?
The lawn mower, however, someone sits on it, but it's just part of virtually any other object in the garage, and the guy doesn't interact with it for any of its vehicular purposes. But he sits on it, so give it one and a half star. The driver of the loader, however, operates it AND talks with a character, which means it should be two stars.
09/09/2016 @ 19:08:34: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
how do you know that guy on the lanw mover isn't talking to somebody ?? have you actually seent the movie?
and sorry that machine is NOT operated, it doesn't move a single inch
09/09/2016 @ 19:21:31: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
BTW why are the objectiosn for this to go ?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_915309.html
it's far background , no engine panel, nobody interacts with it and POORLY visible
10/09/2016 @ 16:06:50: Gomsel: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
10/09/2016 @ 17:07:57: Lateef: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
how do you know that guy on the lanw mover isn't talking to somebody ?? have you actually seent the movie?
and sorry that machine is NOT operated, it doesn't move a single inch
1) It doesn't matter. He's clearly not doing anything with the lawn mower apart from sitting on its stepside. No interaction = 1 star.
2) Sorry, but yes it is - the talking guy is sitting at its controls while the machinery apears to be running, thus he's the present operator of it, and he might potentially be listed as "loader operator" in the screenplay or the credits. There are many examples where if someone sitting in a car is talking, relaxing or doing ... whatever - and it gets two stars, no matter if the vehicle is running or not. While if someone is dancing on the roof of a car, it gets one star.
/ I'm done here.
10/09/2016 @ 17:14:45: Gomsel: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
10/09/2016 @ 17:57:57: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_929800-Pontiac.html
(posting again because it got stuck on the last page and was apparently ignored)
There is probably a way to identify a year range for that one
@Lateef > well explained, nothing to add
12/09/2016 @ 19:02:58: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
1) It doesn't matter. He's clearly not doing anything with the lawn mower apart from sitting on its stepside. No interaction = 1 star.
2) Sorry, but yes it is - the talking guy is sitting at its controls while the machinery apears to be running, thus he's the present operator of it, and he might potentially be listed as "loader operator" in the screenplay or the credits. There are many examples where if someone sitting in a car is talking, relaxing or doing ... whatever - and it gets two stars, no matter if the vehicle is running or not. While if someone is dancing on the roof of a car, it gets one star.
/ I'm done here.
why the f**k was this rejected then ?
http://pics.imcdb.org/13592/untitled.1690.jpg
as this machine had an active role to get rid of a getaway car , so it was actually used
you keep that background machine there just because one guy spoke from it and this one which was activly used for some stupid reason the admins say that it shouldn't be listed, it's so confusing and stupid
12/09/2016 @ 19:24:07: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Hint: admins are not all mind-connected, and we don't always judge interest of entries the same way...
Maybe the admin who validated thought it was a duplicate if the car itself was also listed?
Or maybe you listed it as 1-star, and then it was considered as not worth listing?
12/09/2016 @ 19:26:06: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
And now that I see it is from
http://www.imcdb.org/movie.php?id=149431 ... you were especially annoying then with Neon and you wonder on how he reacted? Come one... be happy that he could not ban you
Stop acting like if all was always done/judged by only one person and without context.
12/09/2016 @ 19:38:49: Gamer: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I added some (in my opinion) accurately drawn cars that should be listed to the comments here:
http://www.imcdb.org/movie_169414-Arthur.html
but so far no one's taken notice...
12/09/2016 @ 20:04:38: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
13/09/2016 @ 11:53:47: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
14/09/2016 @ 18:14:12: opal: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
14/09/2016 @ 22:12:17: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
15/09/2016 @ 20:56:06: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
You're again posting a little quickly here...
