I'm a bit of a perfectionist with IMCDb stuff, a big fat unknown in the middle of a gallery full of otherwise ID'd vehicles just bugs the hell out of me for some reason. I'd rather have them not there at all then left unknown forever.

I gave them both names. The Ford was blurry, but I think there was enough to see it as 1975+ rather than 1973-74. The other one is obviously VW-based. Wasn't sure if it was built using a specific kit or not. No one chimed in.

I agree with eLMeR - if a vehicle is reasonably visible and/or has a role, it deserves a page, whether or not it can be ID'd. If someone comes to imcdb hoping to find out what the thing they've just noticed in the film is, we should acknowledge its existence even if for whatever reason we can not tell them what it is. If our visitor reads the comments, they would then know that the best collection of brains in the universe have tried valiantly but failed to solve it, which is still a valid result.

A big fat unknown in the middle of a gallery full of otherwise ID'd vehicles often bugs the hell out of me as well, but sometimes we just have to swallow hard and live with them. IDability should not be a primary criterion for inclusion/exclusion compared to onscreen visibility or role.

Well, only if they have a chance of being identified one day. Some unknowns don't have that chance, like box trucks seen from the back, with no visible details (cab, rear lights) able to give us a clue about their identity. Those ones should be moved to comments.

I agree, at least for the "and" version: there can be "forever unknowns".
Also, it is always possible that someone someday has info about the car (having worked on the movie, etc. it already happened several times) or that a picture upgrade gives more visual details

If not reasonably visible (like the back of a truck, as Exiv96 mentions), then moving to comments is fine indeed.

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1100968
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1101323 S
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1101388 1985
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=799635
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1042106
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1102017
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1083039

I'd think that over as Kaijuforceneo's IDs are very unreliable. He basically just spouts out a random name for IDs.

I've noticed that too, but I think it can at least be ID'd as a Dodge Ram Van (without a year) for now since supcoach also agreed on that make and model

Needs an update: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_998957-Volkswagen-Golf-Typ-1J.html

Supcoach is frequently wrong too

Well then

Is he? I never noticed.

A lot of comments on the 200 Cigarettes page were ignored...

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101923-Buick.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101922-Cadillac.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101916-Ford.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101931-Nissan-Pathfinder-WD21.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101921-Oldsmobile.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101918.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101925.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1101926.html

Ignored???? It's been about 24 hours since approved

Also most of these have not been complete or correctly ID'd

No, the idea of common vehicles like Dodge Ram Van, Ford F/E-Series, etc. leaved as unknown is to get a year.
If we just put a model without year, they are not anymore in the "unknown" and will most likely never get more precisely identified.

soemthing by default
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1100971

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1101343

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1100902

Caterpillar unknown
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1100667

Park Royal bodied AEC Routemaster:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1100417.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1100457.html

Hino Blue Ribbon:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1100133.html

Park Royal bodied Leyland TN series Titan:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1103029.html

Nissan Diesel / Minsei (民生) UG592:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1102995-Nissan.html

Hino BH:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1102963-Hino-1951.html

Hino Blue Ribbon not update long ago...:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1100133.html

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1101916
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1101831
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1101807 1962 at least
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1100971
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1102645 1981+
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1094850 1976 Buick Century, class: coupe
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103212
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103113
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103126
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103107
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103104
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103124
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1095937
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1103667
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=892588

That was not a missed one, it was waiting for confirmation, you could have posted a comment there