OpenCommunityimcdb - Non-Unidentified Vehicles

12/08/2013 @ 20:29:09: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

maybe there should be an UNKLNOW month !! means al new contributions are suspended and all the folks will have to di a whole month and try to ID the too many unknows on this site :tongue:

12/08/2013 @ 20:40:45: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Well nothing prevents you from doing identifications rather than adding new vehicles :tongue:

12/08/2013 @ 20:49:21: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

this was ID
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_104715.html

you can see on the left side there is a broken light which is distinctive as you can see here
http://www.mcsharryplant.ie/325-zoom/2007-komatsu-pc130-7.jpg

12/08/2013 @ 21:02:26: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

this can be listed as McLaren M12 replica or Made For Movie McLaren M12
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_117974.html

here is the real thing http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1969/Bridgehampton-1969-09-14-007.jpg

looks quite close but small details don't fit plus it was crashed in movie so points to a replica

13/08/2013 @ 16:44:11: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

this was ID
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_595019.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_554444.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_547636.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_515711.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_569705.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_569702.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_182493-M4--Sherman-.html

13/08/2013 @ 16:47:18: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

small question, there are a bunch of North Korean vehicles listed , now we don't even know there offical name, just what estern observers gave them

could we list manufacterer just as North Korea ?

13/08/2013 @ 19:17:01: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Well the name might be found, it is not impossible, so they can stay unknown until then.

13/08/2013 @ 19:20:29: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

For
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_569705.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_547636.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_554444.html
what is the name? It is identified OK but with these obscure military names I sometimes take 10 min to find how to name it.

13/08/2013 @ 20:06:22: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

for the Firefly use this designation http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_184316-Chrysler-M4-A4--Sherman-V--Firefly.html

13/08/2013 @ 20:14:47: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

for self propled gun manufacter perhaps Lorraine like this http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_549611-Lorraine-15-cm-sFH13-1-(Sf).html and add model 7.5cm PAK40 L/46 auf m SPW S307(f) and Marder 1 as bonus name see the story of it at buttom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Becker

13/08/2013 @ 20:28:26: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

another Sherman Firefly to add
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_554444.html

and another :crazy:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560702.html

13/08/2013 @ 20:29:45: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

this was also ID http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560703.html

as you see turret fits perfecly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M10_tank_destroyer

and 3 manufacters to choose from :boidleau:

13/08/2013 @ 20:31:35: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_554444.html the firefly is on the left, no? And it is for the one on the right

13/08/2013 @ 20:32:25: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

LOL

the one on the left , seems military vehicles aren't your thing

13/08/2013 @ 20:33:08: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560702.html -> reliable ?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560703.html -> what's the full name

13/08/2013 @ 20:33:34: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: mike962

LOL

the one on the left , seems military vehicles aren't your thing

... the page was for the one on the right, hence my comment :kiki:

You didn't even check the 2nd pic posted?

13/08/2013 @ 20:34:52: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: mike962

this was also ID http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560703.html

as you see turret fits perfecly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M10_tank_destroyer

and 3 manufacters to choose from :boidleau:

GRRR

It's actually the Britsh version indeed

this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17pdr_SP_Achilles

Brits had the most stupid vehicl designation of entire war

13/08/2013 @ 20:36:20: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Quote From: antp

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560702.html -> reliable ?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_560703.html -> what's the full name

very simple antp, the Sherman with an Big a$$ gun is a Firefly :grin:

13/08/2013 @ 20:39:42: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

OK found it
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_31702-Fisher-M10--Wolverine--1942.html

we can give it same name but instead of Wolwerine its "Achilles "

13/08/2013 @ 20:46:31: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

regarding this http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=554444

if take the carrier the

T-16
The Carrier, Universal, T16, Mark I. was a significantly improved vehicle based upon those built by Ford of Canada, manufactured under Lend Lease by Ford in the United States from March 1943 to 1945. It was chiefly used by Canadian forces during the war as an artillery tractor. After the war, it was used by Swiss and Netherlands forces. It was longer than the Universal with an extra road wheel on the rear bogie, the engine was a Ford Mercury delivering the same power. Instead of the steering wheel controlling the combination brake/warp mechanism, the T-16 had track-brake steering operated by levers (two for each side).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Carrier

there are no T-16 or T16 listed on site so it would be the first..