20/08/2013 @ 20:09:21: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
22/08/2013 @ 19:54:59: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
24/08/2013 @ 20:24:33: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
can this be considered solved or still any doubts ? , now I am somewhat sorry cos I run out of military vehicles to ID
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_236532.html
25/08/2013 @ 10:32:30: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I guess so
26/08/2013 @ 09:56:35: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
this I guess has been solved, wide and low profile turret suggest a 3th generation main battle tank, could be intended as Abrams or a generic one , persoanlly I would have put this in comments section as CGI background
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_523060.html
and for this I think is solved , see the evidence your honor
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_286540.html
26/08/2013 @ 19:40:07: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
think this has been solved , more clearly visible on the left side of thumb , or it doesn't match enough ?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_425903.html
26/08/2013 @ 19:51:05: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I do not know
28/08/2013 @ 10:40:25: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I guess so. We list them that way because they are usually too hard to identify, despite not all being really "custom made"
29/08/2013 @ 17:20:31: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
30/08/2013 @ 20:24:20: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
LOL I mispelled
it's Foreman
31/08/2013 @ 10:51:02: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I do not have that movie anymore, but on my screen the contrast is not that bad. You can still try to enhance the pics in a picture edit program if they are too dark on your monitor.
31/08/2013 @ 18:12:10: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
well this has to be done straight on the source (video file) to get decent quality , doing on the JPG doesn't give that good results at all ..