16/01/2014 @ 17:03:10: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Kato unknown
we have a perfectly matching cabin and the thumbnial is just a copy link not a new addition
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_665053.html
16/01/2014 @ 19:21:54: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
17/01/2014 @ 15:24:30: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Could be Zastava instead of OM then
17/01/2014 @ 15:47:40: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
yes but the shot is rather low quality and far and they look identical with no badges visible shouldn't it be OM by DEFAULT then ?
18/01/2014 @ 15:35:17: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
18/01/2014 @ 17:46:59: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
19/01/2014 @ 11:24:35: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
this looks like its not are real vehicle and dunno how it got 2 stars cos it never was moved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_403278.html
19/01/2014 @ 12:10:36: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Wasn't there a guy on it at some point?
19/01/2014 @ 12:41:28: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
yes but sitting on it very briefly with no movement )of the vehicle) whatsoever is that really enough for 2 stars ?
19/01/2014 @ 20:34:23: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
could still be 2-star, there is no absolute rule
20/01/2014 @ 20:46:00: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
20/01/2014 @ 22:57:53: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I am very sure on this one very distinct livery, front corners of cabin are grey not white
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_666752.html
21/01/2014 @ 15:16:51: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
21/01/2014 @ 15:18:53: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
21/01/2014 @ 19:53:02: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles