busted
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_588245.html

ID written on it..

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_736049.html

very bad quality stock footage
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_296658.html

and this? nearly totally obscured
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_706167.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_631774.html

I saw the pics but missed the name
If you had put all in the same comment (as I often asked) instead of making three separate one...

this needs a correction after reexaming it

it's a GArwood crane on a FWD truck carrier , bad quality pic and very similar design made me mis ID it
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_244433-Lorain.html


and this looks rather like a CCC instead of FWD, again very very similar design but noticed the slope at top of air intakes differes
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_375334-FWD.html

Mis-IDed:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=151093

this does NOT look self-prepeleld rather towed by tractor perhpas
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_507050.html

These two were solved:
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_693460.html
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_706442.html

For the second one, night cub's comment still applies to the links posted...

busted
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737213.html

Volvo BM by default ? cos look it yourself...
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_697716.html



wrong category and solved
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737814.html

I go with Spartan
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_532461.html
rtsbusman1997 didn't provide any arguments why KME while the grill clearly looks Spartan

this cabins are outsorced and used by a lot of producers so the grills have to be used as reference...

this needs a small correction and origin USA
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=737730

busted but aren't the ambulances more in foreground ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=737776


isn't this too far in background ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_367224.html

and this is really realy BAD quality stock footage in music video , why do keep it ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_296658.html

Custom Made "Petpak" looks put together out of scrap and old car bits , see thumbnail , certanly not something professionally made at all
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_552837.html

model origin Australia

Seagrave
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_737776.html

has a DODGE badge so at least highly connected with it
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_728940.html

there is nothing visible of this, why do we keep it ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_697716.html

you can't ID what you can't see and if you can't see it enough what's the point cos even a visitor doesn't see much

this was missed
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_739791.html

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_741321.html

but probably not worth it with this limited view ?

It was not missed. I was sure you would post that one here... He said "most probably", so I was waiting for a confirmation. If you confirm, why not post a comment saying so ?

because it's rather hard to confirm anything for sure from that view but that said it looks to have a covered up JCB logo on the amr cos same position where they put it
http://www.cheffins.co.uk/assets/catalogues/lots/254/2524__3.jpg

but as said not really worth keeping for 1 star... since only the arm is really visible
why not introduce some visibility standarrds already for 1 and 2 star ??? in this way you might solve the HD problem partially



I think this can be named Someca

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_577500.html