03/11/2014 @ 16:30:47: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Never, I do not have time for that
ho about appointing one of the admin to do that ?
this is a duplicate entry cos either a T-72 or T-80 both are already listed with better pics
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_748414-T-72.html
03/11/2014 @ 20:37:45: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
If an admin has time for it why not...
Or else if you wish to make a list, you can, I'll change them when I've some time.
03/11/2014 @ 21:42:53: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
07/11/2014 @ 16:14:39: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
08/11/2014 @ 16:57:54: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
08/11/2014 @ 17:13:30: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
09/11/2014 @ 22:11:00: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
this belongs in simple truck category, I am sure it's lightweight crane on a commercial 3 axle truck chassis
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_525316.html
the problem you don't see anything of the truck cabin , so better in comments ?
10/11/2014 @ 21:16:57: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
11/11/2014 @ 20:22:26: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
11/11/2014 @ 21:04:19: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
It wasn't yet missed
11/11/2014 @ 21:36:07: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
ok, and model origin USA ...
13/11/2014 @ 21:44:21: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
19/11/2014 @ 18:41:11: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
20/11/2014 @ 16:58:42: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
20/11/2014 @ 17:08:50: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
these weren't missed, I haven't yet checked comments, these are from today
21/11/2014 @ 18:32:20: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
question regarding category
road marking machines , do they belong in construction category or they belong in sweeper/ resurfecer category ?
21/11/2014 @ 23:45:26: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I don't know, I guess we can put them in construction category if they are built for that purpose... but don't they use regular vehicles for that?
21/11/2014 @ 23:49:49: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
what exactly are "resurfacer" meant for ? cos its a bit confusing