think it's same producer

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=807751




and this busted but looks rather poorly visible

http://imcdb.org/vehicle_807711.html


and this looks rather generic and not really a military vehicle, more like a riot police thing
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_799977.html

last one looks like something that we have on the site, but I don't remember what name

for http://imcdb.org/vehicle_807711.html it is strange that the other one(s) linked in the comment disappeared

HGG-1
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_82691-Hyundai.html

you said yourself ANTP
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_101720-BOMAG.html

back then we didn't list these things, but now that we do...

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=808763

and what about this ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=94159

BTW we have a bunch of Bobcat unknown

model names are realy hard on this things specially since many have different model names based on different engine


so perhaps those market as Bobcat just leave them without model names ?
http://imcdb.org/vehicles_make-Bobcat_model-unknown.html

If none of these are really identifiable with a model name, we could indeed drop the "unknown"

We have already cracked 900 pages of unknown vehicles here

http://imcdb.org/vehicles.php?unknown

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=809494
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=805816
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=600153

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=801648

think main pic can be replaced too with correct 4:3 ration

http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=808991
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=521203
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=143397
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=356856
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=341954
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=742235
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=804550

I thought "more misses than usual", but that was on the weekend, more logical (more comments to check, not enough time to check all...)

this needs correction too as mentioned

it's actually a DT-75
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_403232-VgTZ-DT-54.html

Is there a valid reason for having Hy-Mac + Hymac makes? Shouldn't we merge both under one of these two names?

we could merge them as just Hymac

"The "Hymac" brand name has been used in several variations over the years (Lower case, all caps and hyphenated versions) in the companies own marketing material and the livery/ decals on the machines.

HY-MAC/HYMAC/Hymac being the most common variations.
HY-MAC was the US Registered Trade Mark of the Hydraulic Machinery Company America. The actual UK company HYMAC LIMITED dates back to 1946. The HY-MAC trade Mark was assigned to HYMAC LIMITED in 1972"

http://tractors.wikia.com/wiki/Hymac

ok

I guess we can assume Ford 9N repainted as the color looks to polished for a 50+ years tractor
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_807690.html