Subject: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
03/07/2015 @ 20:59:36: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
you said it yourself
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=472964
04/07/2015 @ 17:01:36: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=766526
04/07/2015 @ 17:10:44: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
That's from yesterday evening, not yet so old
06/07/2015 @ 18:53:22: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=825674
07/07/2015 @ 20:15:31: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
might as well go with petep's assertion
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=825916
11/07/2015 @ 11:42:05: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=827666
13/07/2015 @ 19:06:14: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=828255
13/07/2015 @ 21:25:57: Gamer: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=296548
16/07/2015 @ 18:30:08: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=481903
19/07/2015 @ 15:42:39: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_829665-Samsung.html
20/07/2015 @ 19:58:54: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=828852
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_830369-Ford.html
22/07/2015 @ 21:48:37: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_769187.html


looks fictional
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_799977.html
24/07/2015 @ 20:19:22: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=828225
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=827914
25/07/2015 @ 20:15:57: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_828667.html

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_829507.html
25/07/2015 @ 21:12:27: eLMeR: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Not really identified. And if really a Dodge 100-Series Commando (which has to be confirmed), there is certainly some cleaning to be done about how these trucks are identified in the IMCDb, all the more when the G-Something complement is used.
27/07/2015 @ 19:22:17: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=563880
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=830757
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=800181

i am sure this is a CLARK
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=198471



wrong category
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=95796
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=65304

no model name
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=683170
27/07/2015 @ 21:06:06: night cub: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
It would help if you wouldn't capitalize all the letters of the makes, that way we can just copy and paste. Otherwise we have to retype. Thanks.
27/07/2015 @ 21:43:17: antp: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I already tried to say that... several times

If needed to make it more visible, bold text is better :

This vehicle is [b*]make name[/b], I am sure


without the * it becomes :
This vehicle is make name, I am sure
28/07/2015 @ 21:37:36: mike962: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
http://imcdb.org/vehicle_832094-M4--Sherman-.html


could we have this vans all as Fiat Ducato ? since they are produced in Italy
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=830831
29/07/2015 @ 03:40:56: eLMeR: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
[...] could we have this vans all as Fiat Ducato ? since they are produced in Italy
http://imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=830831

And I propose to have all impossible to identify 2001+ Renault Trafic / Opel Vivaro / Vauxhall Vivaro / Nissan Primastar as Vauxhall Vivaro, as they're made in UK :grin:
... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 ... 274 
Back