Search
List of Categories
Who has read this topic?
Add Reply
Printable version
Activate notificationGeneral » Nude pics vs Google
Reminder of the previous message
Err, you have noticed my specific quoting above the pic? Have you?
I'm not complaining about pics like that, they are totally legal (and according my preferences
) - but I do complain, that this kind of advertises (as for online casinos, malware-shit, money loan offers, etc.) is very bad for the reputation of IMCDb and so for the reputation of the IMCDb-users -we all here-, too. We see ourselves as an international combo of more or less nerdic car- and also movie-freaks, who have the indeed serious aspiration to build up a serious database, which maybe even can be used as a kind of encyclopedia for vehicles in movies, even just for vehicles, too. We have so many specialists for specific items, that the total sum of our knowledge is good enough to be generally accepted as a kind of book of reference.But this kind of chavy advertises, meant for a chavy underclass target audience, pulls down our reputation in a very bad way. I'm not the only one, who classifies and charcterizes a website (also print-magazines and TV-programmes) by the respectives advertises. When I see such chavy advertises, I put the homepage, where they are on, on the same level - and the members and users there, too!
You my call my habit prejudice, preposession, conceit or so, that's not wrong - but you always have to think about, that a lot of other people do think in the same way. So you, Antoine should be careful, that not too many people with a serious interest in our engagement get scared due this underclass-shit.
You know you can't have it both ways. You complain when Antoine is trying to delete the pics of naked women (which don't belong here and are against board rules), which is the reason that Google Ads dropped the site. You cried "CENSORSHIP". And now you complain when the replacement has lower standards. Which he wouldn't have to do if people followed the few rules here. You can't bitch about both. Pick a side and stop chastising the rest of us who are trying to clean up the site. The nice thing about Google Ads is that the website owner can choose what type of ads appear on their page. Not sure if the replacement ad placers do the same.
I forgot to click on the asian women prostitution ad and now it doesn't come back.
http://i368.photobucket.com/albums/oo124/marxbrosfan/KG/ads.jpg
http://i368.photobucket.com/albums/oo124/marxbrosfan/KG/ads.jpg
Hmm, I don't get Asian girls offered - but Russian
What's coming next, maybe help-calls from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/419_scams
You complain when Antoine is trying to delete the pics of naked women (which don't belong here and are against board rules), which is the reason that Google Ads dropped the site. You cried "CENSORSHIP". And now you complain when the replacement has lower standards. Which he wouldn't have to do if people followed the few rules here. You can't bitch about both.
Indeed I found that quite incredible
I'll block ads on Android until we change again the ad system.
Nice to see he's doing his bit to clean up the site... http://www.imcdb.org/movie_72353-Les-valseuses.html
What can we do with sixcyl's nature of his fetish
My guess we all share our own fetish here, G-MANN
My guess we all share our own fetish here, G-MANN
That's completely besides the point. I doubt most of us have fetishes that directly relate to the functioning of the site
The discussion on the page has been wiped, including even the non-nude pics. It seems to was sixcyl himself who removed them from his comment 
Good news everyone
It seems that Google will finally re-enable ads on the site. So the cleaning wasn't useless.
And also, we should continue on that way.
Google blocked ads again. At least this time they provided a URL.
This time it was for a picture on the forum. A picture randomly replaced by tinypic.com (which re-uses images URLs).
The forum is not on the same server as the main site.
There are no Google ads on the forum.
It is a different subdomain.
But it seems that for them it does not matter.
And despite I deleted the thread with the picture, they rejected the appeal.
I am not sure of what else I could do
The box where I can write a comment when I notify them that I fixed the problem can only contain 100 characters, not easy to explain the full thing.
This time it was for a picture on the forum. A picture randomly replaced by tinypic.com (which re-uses images URLs).
The forum is not on the same server as the main site.
There are no Google ads on the forum.
It is a different subdomain.
But it seems that for them it does not matter.
And despite I deleted the thread with the picture, they rejected the appeal.
I am not sure of what else I could do
The box where I can write a comment when I notify them that I fixed the problem can only contain 100 characters, not easy to explain the full thing.
At this point I were you, I'll show the middle finger to Big G.
That wouldn't help much for getting money from ads